My article in last week’s Cornish Guardian was published
under the above title. It was as follows:
This weekend, while “tidying” my home, I came across an
article that I wrote some three-and-a-bit years ago. It was titled: “We can all
make a difference.”
It started: “Why bother … what is the point … it is already
a ‘done deal’ … we cannot change anything. How many times have we heard
statements such as these … and to be fair, how many times have we felt
downhearted at a lack of progress …”
But the article went on to extol the wonders of “people
power” and how people like you and I could actually foster positive change.
It will surprise no-one that the article was written at an
optimistic time for me, namely the immediate aftermath of the County Council’s decision
to refuse planning permission for an incinerator at St Dennis.
I still passionately believe that everyone can make a
difference. And yet, I increasingly find myself dismayed at the lack of
democracy at Cornwall Council. I would like to give three very topical
examples.
Take the incinerator as example one. Even though planning
permission was refused, the leadership of Cornwall Council has steadfastly
refused to push forward an alternative to incineration. As a result, plans for
the waste plant have stormed ahead almost by default. The Leader of Cornwall
Council has even lobbied central government to impose the incinerator on the
China Clay Area, and the ten-strong ruling Cabinet has ignored a unanimous
recommendation from its Waste Panel to explore an alternative proposal.
There is also the proposed “Strategic Partnership for
Support Services,” which would allow the private sector to deliver a range of
core council services. It was opposed by the majority of councillors at a
recent Full Council meeting, but the ruling Cabinet has disgracefully announced
that it is still going to proceed with the privatisation anyway, irrespective
of the views of elected members.
And then there are the plans for a new archive centre. A working
group of councillors recommended that the centre be built at St Austell, but
the subsequent report to a scrutiny committee proposed a site at Redruth.
The scrutiny committee voted 11 votes to one to recommend
the St Austell site. At the time of writing, the decision has yet to be debated
at Cabinet, but the report for
the meeting ignores the findings of the scrutiny committee and still recommends
the Redruth site.
Though many of us may feel dismayed at what has been
happening at County Hall, we must not let this lead us to be disengaged with
local politics. We must use these frustrations to redouble our efforts to make
sure that things do change.
Postscript
Cornwall Council’s Cabinet voted by six votes to four not to
build the archive centre in St Austell.
2 comments:
How about setting up a locally owned cooperative company under democratic control of the people using the services, to take over the running of services, thereby cutting the Politburo out, rather than outsourcing to corporates who will have to cut corners to take a profit cut?
It is pointless blaming Cornwall Council for foisting an incinerator on you. It is mandated by an EU Directive dealing with waste disposal that mandates incineration in place of landfills on pain of heavy fines for non-compliance.
If MK were running Cornwall Council you'd find yourself in the same position.
Post a Comment