The Observer has published a version of my letter of
complaint concerning the Free Cornwall article published on 24th June. The
letter has been rewritten rather than edited, and I have included both below.
The published letter is as follows:
Don’t patronise the Cornish
The article “Free Cornwall” (magazine last week) misrepresented
what Mebyon Kernow – the party for Cornwall (MK) stands for. MK is not
campaigning for independence, but greater self-government / devolution through
a national assembly for Cornwall .
The article was based around vague and unsubstantiated claims of “separation”, was
disrespectful to the Cornish language and, in what century is it acceptable to
describe Cllr Dr Loveday Jenkin as “a charismatic MK pixie”? It is little
wonder that here in Cornwall the
article has been variously described as “patronising,” “sarcastic,”
“condescending” and “prejudicial.”
Now spot the differences! My original letter was as follows:
The “Free Cornwall” article in last week’s magazine section of the Observer was a poor piece of journalism and badly misrepresented what
Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall (MK) stands for.
When contacted by the journalist who wanted to write a piece
about the movement for “Cornish Independence,” we explained in considerable
detail that MK was not campaigning for independence, but greater
self-government / devolution through a National Assembly for Cornwall.
We are therefore very disappointed that he chose to ignore this and based his whole article around vague and unsubstantiated falsehoods of “separation,” “independence,” and an “independentCornwall .”
The article includes a range of inaccuracies, it is disrespectful to the
Cornish language and, frankly, in what century is it acceptable to describe
Cllr Dr Loveday Jenkin, a respected professional woman, as “a charismatic MK
pixie”?
We are therefore very disappointed that he chose to ignore this and based his whole article around vague and unsubstantiated falsehoods of “separation,” “independence,” and an “independent
It is little wonder that here in Cornwall
the article has been variously described as “patronising,” “sarcastic,”
“condescending” and “prejudicial.”
It saddens me greatly – as someone who has read the Guardian
/ Observer newspapers for most of my adult life – that the Observer has
produced such a disrespectful article on the Party that I am proud to lead.
1 comment:
Notice the disappearance of phrases like "poor piece of journalism" and "inaccuracies". Disappointing to say the least
Post a Comment