It is my view that “Towards a National Assembly of Cornwall”
clearly sets out the nature of the new democratic settlement that MK is campaigning
for.
The document states that:
“Mebyon Kernow has a manifesto commitment to the creation of
a legislative National Assembly of Cornwall, with powers broadly equivalent to
the present Scottish Parliament, through a “Government of Cornwall Act” … [securing]
democratic control over most areas of domestic politics in Cornwall, and
associated public expenditure.”
The document further states that:
“The National Assembly of Cornwall would not be independent
of the UK – it
would be an integral and empowered part of the governance of the United
Kingdom .”
I fully appreciate how important it is for campaigners to be
careful and precise in the language that they use. And as the leader of MK, I
consider myself extremely focused on making sure that MK press statements and
publications, as well as speeches, are well crafted and not open to
misinterpretation.
I am therefore increasingly saddened at how MK’s campaign
for greater self-government for Cornwall
is being continuously misrepresented as a thrust for complete independence,
Only last week, a local journalist posted an on-line story
which implied MK wanted the same powers as an “independent Scotland .”
And today a news story about MK in the Scotsman referred to
us as an “independence party” with a “goal of independence.”
I have also been informed that the latest edition of The Big Issue includes a feature on, what it describes as a “whole host of regional secessionist groups” and “micro-independence movements across the
Is it really too much to ask that MK policy position is reported accurately?
Hello Dick,
ReplyDeleteI hope you and yours are well. In relation to your blog above I wonder if you ever write letters or correction/complaint to publications that misrepresent MK's views, and if so what responses you've had?