In my column in this week’s Cornish Guardian, I have
focussed on the report which has shown arts funding is disproportionately spent
in London . The article is as
follows:
The over-centralised nature of the United
Kingdom means that many areas – deemed
peripheral by central government – lose out financially to London
and the South East of England.
This has been reinforced by the publication of an independent
report which reveals a shocking bias towards London
in the allocation of public funding for the arts.
Titled “Rebalancing Our Cultural Capital,” the report notes
that, in 2012-2013, Arts Council England distributed a total of £320m of
taxpayers' money. London received £20
per head of population, compared to £3.60 per person elsewhere.
And last year, the Department of Culture, Media and Sport distributed
£450m of public funding to what it deemed “major national cultural institutions.”
The figures are truly shocking – the report states that London
receives £49 per head of population compared to just £1 per person outside the
capital.
Taken together, the figures show that for every sixteen
pounds of taxpayers' money allocated to the arts in 2012-2013, fifteen pounds
went to London .
But the distribution of such funding is not a one off
“blip.” The report demonstrates that such unbalanced expenditure has been the
norm for years.
The distribution of Lottery funding also significantly
favours London . Arts Council
England has had responsibility for £3.5 billion from the National Lottery since
1995, of which London received £165
per head of population compared to £47 elsewhere.
Such inequity cannot – in any way – be justified, and this
compelling new report rightly argues that “there is a need for geographically
proportionate distribution [of funding] related to size of population.”
It is also to be welcomed that a number of prominent figures
in the industry have thrown their support behind the report, which was produced
by three individuals at their own expense.
Broadcaster and author Melvyn Bragg described the document
as “timely, urgent and damning of an increasingly centralised funding process.”
He added: “London is simply eating
up the resources, which are limited, and is starving the rest of the
country."
Film director David Puttnam meanwhile hit out at the “wholly
unjustifiable scale of bias towards London ”
and condemned the “policies that allow London
– most especially affluent Londoners – to be underwritten at the expense of the
rest of the country."
It is certainly noteworthy that the Prime Minister recently
admitted the UK
“has been too London-centric for far too long.” But we need action from him and
his Government – not just words.
No comments:
Post a Comment