Sport is dominating the news in
The descent of Flight 2012 into RNAS Culdrose, the start of the
ten-week relay from Lands End and the first full day of the procession, as the
torch weaved its way through
It certainly placed the wonder of
From my own Parish, torch bearers included Val Hawken and David
Denmead. Val was honoured because of her endless marathon running and the many
thousands of pounds she has raised for Cancer Research, while David was
rewarded because of his fantastic work on behalf of the Parkinson's support and
research charity.
The event has certainly shown how sport can bring people
together and help celebrate achievement.
By contrast, the controversy about the stadium rumbles on,
following last week’s meeting of Cornwall Council.
Readers of the Cornish Guardian will know that I have been
critical of how this issue has been handled, but I do believe that
But at the meeting, councillors voted by 55 votes to 46
against the Council exploring the possibility of using public money to underpin
the project.
The main aspects of the revised proposal presented at the
meeting were that the Council should investigate “whether it would be
appropriate for the Council to take the lead in delivering a stadium
for Cornwall,” that there should be detailed scrutiny of any proposal
brought forward, and that “a detailed report setting out the business case with
full financial information be brought back to full Council.”
I was therefore extremely disappointed that councillors voted
to throw out the proposal without even wishing to investigate the details or
costs or to consider what the sporting and economic benefits might be.
It saddens me that Cornwall Council is getting into such a mess
on this issue, when there is so much talk about a sporting legacy from the
Olympic Games and associated government investment.
The legacy from that investment should not just be
restricted to
Monday, 21 May 2012
Sport: The Olympics and the Stadium for Cornwall
Posted by Dick Cole at 13:12
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I agree it's appalling that Councillers voted against a deteiled examination of costs & benefits. Where does this leave the stadium now? Is it dead & buried? However we know who voted against & it's not that long to the next elections. Step up to the plate MK and reap the rewards of being the only party who thinks beyond the 'wht's in it for me & my cronies' attitude of the London based parties
I have written to all the Councillors who voted against - have had a few replies but some of those who voted no did so because they did not the CC to be involved in funding. However, surely they could have supported a remit for CC to have a full examination of benefits/funding etc and take the lead in taking the Stadium forwards. What is wrong with our elected representatives - no imagination or will to pursue something for the benefit of rugby etc and the economy!
Post a Comment